WHITE PAPER
HARDWARE CONSIDERATIONS FOR
ABL FIELD EXAMINATIONS
Sponsored By:

About FinSoft, LLC
BY: The entire FinSoft, LLC team
This White Paper will be updated periodically to reflect changes in technology.
Last revision Date: December 1, 2009
Copyright © 1996-2009 FinSoft, LLC - All Rights
Reserved
|
OVERVIEW While Asset Based Lending (ABL) survived without computers for almost 45 years, the new year offers the choices and challenges of finding the right combination of hardware, software and report format to satisfy the quality requirements of management. This "White Paper" is written as an overview of the general hardware and operating systems available and then focuses on the software choices available to field examiner's. NOTE:
Things have Changed and this white paper was started in 1996.
Software is more than the ABL field exam report because that now includes data
analysis from client electronic reports. Please note that a complete
solution includes both field examination software and data analysis software.
Integration of the two is even better. This White Paper has been split
into different white papers for Hardware and Software due to the expanded data
software section. HARDWARE (in brief) Processors: Most of the new chips are duel core and this lets your virus scan run in on one processor while you work on the other. Quad core and then 8 core machines will be here soon enough, and the competition between AMD and Intel has indeed made these all speed demons. You'll see better utilization of the multiple cores in the software released after 2009 due to Microsoft's .NET compiler enhancements. RAM: Screens: Want to make a BIG MISTAKE? Order a 14" screen at 1280 X 800 or 1440 X 900 and you may just go blind. You will likely hear complaints from the staff about the tiny font sizes being displayed. It is a complete mismatch to go up in resolution and then down in screen size. Wide screen laptops at 16:9 are a mistake at less than 17" and that becomes a luggable, but not airplane friendly machine. Try this before you buy and avoid ALL widescreen laptops that are under 15.5" on the diagonal measurement. The native resolutions are important to consider because many of the available screen resolutions in the Windows screen properties look terrible, thus making a switch to a lower resolution somewhat problematic. As an example, our IBMT60 laptop with a 14" screen runs fine at 1,400 X 1050, but 1024 X 768 seems to be overly large and grainy on the same screen. Our 20" monitors runs at 1600 X 1200 and looks great. Other resolutions on that screen are out of focus and fonts tend to look squashed and distorted. Again, smaller wide-screen displays are not designed for business use, but they are indeed becoming more common. The future may require larger screens to compensate for this widescreen (anti-business user) madness.
Here are some of the common screen sizes:
If the ultimate portable is what you seek then you'll be squinting at the higher resolutions. 14" screens are a minimum since the resolutions have gone up. A 15" screen is a bit crisper at the higher resolutions and portable. 17" models look great but are tough to lug around and not useful on an airplane, but most of us are at a desk with these. NOTE: Cheaper machines have shared graphics memory. This takes some conventional RAM and uses it for video RAM. Not a good idea and these machines can be painfully slow. If you have one of these, then get more RAM (at least 2 Gig) and you'll see the speed pickup about 25%. If you fly often, the 15" and larger screens will get jammed into your body when the forward passenger reclines, but you'll be better off when you go to get work done, which is much more of the time. Use the Ergonomics Act as an excuse to get a better screen. More pixels on the screen can increase both screen content displayed and eye strain on the smaller notebook displays. Our advice, stick with at least 1024 X 768 display settings if your screen is 14" or less diagonal and scale up as screen size, graphics card resolution and your deteriorating eyesight allows. Windows also offers some larger font options for icons and web browsers. Keyboards: Ports: Port Replicators and Docking stations have evolved into smaller port replicators. Toshiba uses one replicator across the entire line of computers and other are following that model (IBM has a similar replicator for many models). Yes, you can plug in your mouse, your printer, your Ethernet cable and your power cord when you get into the office, but the replicators are easier to deal with on a recurring basis. Your IT Department: Software installations are relatively easy and the headache of finding good drivers is virtually gone with since Windows 2000 came out. Most machines are running well out of the box and prior setup hassles are largely gone.
On The Cheap for the Self Employed (or for the really cheap) In regard to speed, unless you develop software, routinely perform video editing or animated graphics, the speed issue for business has flattened out. Expect few benefits with super chips for business applications. Data analysis is another consideration, because more speed will make file analysis faster. If you develop software, download and parse lots of data like us, then faster is always better and the new Core2 Duo (or quad) chips are a bit faster than the old stuff from 2005.
What Should You Buy? Our advice is:
Windows XP or VISTA or Windows-7?
Macintosh Virus Paranoia YES, you need to subscribe to the automatic updates YES, you need a software firewall such as Norton Internet Suite or McAfee Internet Suite or Zone Alarm YES, you need to run spyware software checks from Lavasoft and SpyBot to keep the junk out YES, you need to password protect your computers and remove all Guest Accounts YES, you need to turn off file sharing if you are on a WiFi network or hotel network or your borrower's network so that they cannot get your files. YES, you need to password protect your virus software so that a virus (or an auditor) cannot turn off the virus software Decisions Decisions SPEED = SIMPLICITY VERSUS OVERHEAD This is a hardware and operating system question, but again, we have some frank answers. If you use only spreadsheets, speed is generally not a problem. Spreadsheets are all written in "C" (not C++) and the applications are fast. But what if we link the spreadsheet into the word processor with OLE links or
DDE? Word takes 3-5 Megs for the executable program and Excel Takes
3.5-5 Megs for the executable program, plus all of the DLL's for Excel and Word, plus the
OLE layers and you have a need far in excess of 32 Megs! This Ram and processor cram
is often called "Overhead" and it slows down the system. The power of Excel
and Word are deep, they just require lots of RAM. For speed, keep it simple,
lose speed with linking (and gain all the maintenance chores) or find a better way. THE GREAT HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE LIES Do you believe that hardware will make your examiners faster? Do you believe that spending almost $1,500 on a new IBM ThinkPad, with a life expectancy of 3 years will get your examinations done faster? Do you believe that the new Microsoft Office 2007 / 2010 will allow you to complete examinations faster? The Spin Doctors at Microsoft and Intel are having a hard time getting word processors and small spreadsheets to run faster (ok maybe it's 3/1000th of a second faster on the recalculation -- BIG DEAL!). Lies, lies, lies. We see virtually no speed difference in our 486 versus our Pentiums when it comes to spreadsheet speed. It scrolls a bit faster, it shows graphs a bit faster, it plays games a lot faster (by the way, that's from the video card improvements). There is some improvement if you link to word processors (e.g., glue Word and Excel together). In short, the productivity advantage of the "big-expensive" machine is under 10% with a 0% improvement in the quality of reports. Many people are getting newer machines due to super cheap prices and improved reliability of the hardware and Windows-XP. Our 1.6 Ghz Duo Core machines with 2Gig of Ram are so fast on spreadsheets and word processing that there is no speed improvement seen. There are two exception, noted in the next section below. Lies, lies, lies. We see virtually no speed improvement with Office-2000/XP/2003/2007/2010. Office is code bloated and packed with features to play with. Productivity will likely decline from using Office-2000/XP/2003/2007 as users build frustration and use time reading help files, trying to find and use all of the features. The truth is that spreadsheet features have been relatively consistent for over 20 years. Office 2007/2010 includes a new menu structure to confuse people even more. The spreadsheet has slowly evolved with better formatting, better graphs, better preview screens, Etc., but the basics developed by VisiCalc (circa 1981) are the same. In short, the productivity advantage of Office-2000/XP/2003/2007/2010 is 0% (possibly a loss) with no improvement in results-based quality. Office 2000/XP/2003/2007/2010 will require those that switch to learn a few new tricks to get back the speed that they once had. Office 2007 will destroy macros that use menu commands and some older pre-Office-2007 functions, so now you need to start your automation all over again. The lies continue to be perpetrated by Intel, AMD and Microsoft who want shareholder results. What kind of results do you want? Custom tailored and highly integrated software is the best way to improve the speed and quality of field examinations. Just look at accounting software, factoring software or back-office software used in the ABL business...or are you still using spreadsheets? We cover the customization choices below.
"Don't
become hardware rich and software poor if you wish to save time." WHEN FAST HARDWARE MATTERS Our company, FinSoft, produces a fast data analysis package that is specifically targeted to analyzing ABL data. Faster machines process data faster because in the case of data analysis, there are millions of calculations being done. Our faster machines can reage a receivable report, refoot it and calculate all ineligbles from a 40,000 invoice report in about 30 seconds. Yes, the hardware does matter and in our case the software uses very advanced logic to make all of the calculations so fast. Windows VISTA and Windows-7 are using advanced graphics display technology that makes some of the screens look like a glossy photograph. This requires very fast graphics processing and a new machine is going to have that. Back to data analysis. This is a software solution.
We have cut the time on some field exams in half with our data analysis product.
We've found plenty of fraud cases and probably prevented others with detailed
analysis and mathematical proofs. Why would you want to do your fieldwork
and back office calculations slower? Why would you want extra staff?
Why would you hire an outsource firm that can't get things done with data
analysis? Why would you avoid software that was written specifically for
ABL to save time and money in the manner mentioned above? A possible
"avoidance" answer (excuse) could be that you are paid by the hour
(possible), you
like to work too hard (unlikely) or you haven't seen what we've got (hard to
believe) Great software deserves your attention, but all of the hardware
is about the same.. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CONTACT:
Joe Caplan, Managing Director
phone (410) 747-7994
e-mail:
Home |
AW
Features | AR Features | AssetArchive | AR
Challenge | Programming |
Customers
About
FinSoft | Support
| Outsource Firms |
White Paper |
Free ABL Software | ABL
Home Page
Copyright © 1998-2009 FinSoft, LLC - All Rights Reserved